Tendon Adaptations to Eccentric and Heavy-Slow Resistance training in Patellar andAchilles Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review

Supplementary Files

Figure

Keywords

tendinopathy
resistance training
rehabilitation

How to Cite

Manieu Seguel, J., Paternoster, F. K., Schappacher-Tilp, G., Konrad, A., & Tilp, M. (2026). Tendon Adaptations to Eccentric and Heavy-Slow Resistance training in Patellar andAchilles Tendinopathy: A Scoping Review. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 11(5), 024. https://doi.org/10.36950/2026.5ciss024

Abstract

Introduction & Purpose

Tendinopathy is a disabling and painful condition, with a prevalence of up to 45% in specific sports like running, basketball, and volleyball (Nutarelli et al., 2023). Mechanical overuse of the tendon due to repetitive strain beyond physiological limits, results in a degenerated and weakened tendon (Radovanović et al., 2022). Eccentric training (ECC), has been the gold standard of treatment in tendinopathies for the last 30 years. However, alternative protocols like Heavy-Slow Resistance Training (HSRT) have attracted the interest of researchers since eccentric training can be mechanically demanding and painful (Sayana and Maffulli, 2007). This scoping review aims to synthesize the available evidence on the effects of chronic eccentric training and HSRT on structural, morphological, and clinical outcomes in patients with patellar and Achilles tendinopathy.

Methods

An electronic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). In total, 7176 studies were identified. Articles were screened based on sample age (18-50 years old), intervention type, and duration (> 8 weeks). Tendon thickness, stiffness, cross-sectional area, neovascularization and Young’s modulus, along with pain, muscle strength, and the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment (VISA) questionnaire were assessed. To estimate changes due to the different interventions, percentages of changes between pre and post values were calculated for each study. Percentage changes were weighted based on sample size of each study. Pooled mean percentages were classified into different magnitudes, ranging from trivial to very large, based on those suggested by Behm et al., 2016.

Results

After a thorough screening process, 16 studies were included in the review. Both interventions showed beneficial results on clinical and functional outcomes, increasing muscle strength and VISA questionnaire score in both tendons, and decreasing pain. HSRT yielded superior results when compared to ECC by reducing (pathologic) tendon thickness (-2.1%, n=8 vs 1.3%, n=5) and neovascularization (-23.2%, n=6 vs -11.7%, n=5), while ECC training showed greater increases in tendon stiffness (7.1%, n=6 vs 0.3%, n=3) (Fig.1).

Discussion

Tendon-specific responses were observed, with an increase in stiffness in individuals with Achilles tendinopathy, and a decrease in those with patellar tendinopathy. While these differences may reflect underlying anatomical and physiological characteristics as well as tendon-specific functions (Finni, 2001; Biewener and Roberts, 2000), the heterogeneity of measurement methods limits direct comparisons (Khair et al., 2024). Both protocols showed beneficial effects on the Achilles and patellar tendons, and their associated muscles (triceps surae and vastus lateralis, respectively), and showed large to very large improvements in clinical outcomes, including pain (ECC: -37.5%, HSRT: -54.6%), muscle strength (ECC: 7.8%, HSRT: 17.0%), and the VISA questionnaire (ECC: 31.2%, HSRT: 32.6%).

Conclusions

As both protocols reduced pain and increased function significantly, HSRT could be a promising time-saving alternative to ECC training for the rehabilitation of tendinopathies, when the latter is not possible. Further research is needed to elucidate if ECC or HSRT is superior to the other. Matching and standardizing training parameters when prescribing resistance training is the first step to try and elucidate the real effects of both interventions on tendon characteristics.

References

Behm DG, Blazevich AJ, Kay AD, McHugh M. (2016). Acute effects f muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, Jan;41(1):1-11. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0235

Biewener AA, Roberts TJ. (2000). Muscle and tendon contributions to force, work, and elastic energy savings: a comparative perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, Jul;28(3):99–107. PMID: 10916700

Finni T. Muscle mechanics during human movement revealed by in vivo measurements of tendon force and muscle length. (2001).

Khair RM, Sukanen M, Finni T. (2024). Achilles Tendon Stiffness: Influence of Measurement Methodology. Ultrasound Med Bio, Oct;50(10):1522–9. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.06.005

Nutarelli S, da Lodi CMT, Cook JL, Deabate L, Filardo G. Epidemiology of Patellar Tendinopathy in Athletes and the General Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med, 2023 Jun 5;11(6). doi:10.1177/23259671231173659

Radovanović G, Bohm S, Peper KK, Arampatzis A, Legerlotz K. (2022) Evidence-Based High-Loading Tendon Exercise for 12 Weeks Leads to Increased Tendon Stiffness and Cross-Sectional Area in Achilles Tendinopathy: A Controlled Clinical Trial. Sports Med – Open, Dec;8(1):149. doi:10.1186/s40798-022-00545-5

Sayana MK, Maffulli N. Eccentric calf muscle training in non-athletic patients with Achilles tendinopathy. (2007). J Sci Med Sport, Feb;10(1):52–8. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.008.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Josefina Manieu Seguel, Florian Kurt Paternoster, Gudrun Schappacher-Tilp, Andreas Konrad, Markus Tilp