CISS - Current Issues in Sport Science 8(3)
DOI: doi.org/10.36950/2023.3ciss006
Submitted: 30 April 2023
Accepted: 28 September 2023
Published: 19 January 2024

#picturesofchange: Physical self-representations in social media as a sign of change in sports and movement culture – An integrative review with implications for physical education

Fabian Muhsal1*, David Jaitner1, Jannika M. John2
1 Technical University of Braunschweig, Institute of Sports Science and Movement Pedagogy
2 Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Institute of Sports Science
* f.muhsal@tu-braunschweig.de

Abstract

The mediatization of communicative action is a process that centrally moderates social change. Changes in communication (e.g., through new kinds of media) thus have momentous consequences for social forms and processes. As essential cultural signs, social bodies, their medial representation, and areas of society in which bodies play a role are interrelated with changes in communication. Currently, physical self-representations in digital media play a key role and hold strong possibilities of influence on the culture of sports and movement. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of visual self-representations in social media on this culture. Following an integrative review methodology, we systematically organised the current state of empirical evidence and identified the implications that digital self-representations in social media (esp., Instagram, Facebook) have on sports and movement culture and therefore possibly on physical education (PE). Six electronic databases, reference lists, and citations of full-text articles were searched for English and German language peer-reviewed articles. The search string combined different terms relating to social media and sports culture. Two independent reviewers screened all identified studies for eligibility and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. The results point to direct changes in some sports and movement cultures such as the prosumtion (consumption and production) of videos in skateboarding or the perpetuation of body ideals in the fitness culture. Other sports and movement cultures are changed indirectly via different new use cases for the athletes, as they can use social media to either build communities or gain visibility. As the practice of prosuming bodily self-representations is a growing part of the lifeworld of adolescents, such practices could become content within PE. Therewith, students could acquire competencies that allow them to intellectually relate to these practices, which could help them in understanding, changing or transcending their existing realities.

Keywords

social change, mediatization, body image, physical education

Introduction

The content dimension of learning is an essential factor in planning, implementing and evaluating school lessons (Amade-Escot, 2006; Kansanen & Meri, 1999). Compared to science subjects (e.g., natural sciences, languages), the issues of learning in physical education (PE) are primarily based on social phenomena within the students’ lifeworld (Amade-Escot & O’Sullivan, 2007; Zander, 2017). Although the question of which specific sports and movement cultures should become objects of PE is discussed academically in diverse ways and takes on different forms in international curricula (e.g., traditional sports, basic themes of movement, trend sports, fitness activities, media sports), the underlying aim of PE is that students physically experience cultural practices that are of significance in their immediate lives, gain competence to act within these practices, and to intellectually relate to these practices in order to understand, change or transcend existing sports and movement cultures (Ehni, 1977; Nyberg & Larsson, 2014; Serwe-Pandrick et al., 2023; Siedentop et al., 2019).

As structures and functions of social forms and processes are constantly changing (Corsi, 2020), the content of PE oriented towards social phenomena is also exposed to constant possibilities of adjustment. Besides globalisation, commercialisation, and individualisation, mediatization centrally moderates social change in modern society (Krotz, 2014) and also significantly influences sports and movement cultures (Ličen et al., 2022). In this regard, the common practice to position and present pictures of bodies on social media might also impact sports and movement culture (Grimmer, 2017, 2019; Sanderson, 2011), which in turn might also have consequences for the content of PE.

Within our integrative review, we focus on the practice of physical self-representation on social media and synthesize the international state of research on this social phenomenon. We specifically examine how such practices might have changed sports and movement culture, which generates an empirically sound basis for the development of content within PE as the practice of physical self-representation on social media is particularly common among adolescents (Pürgstaller, 2023).

Theoretical background

Changes in society through mediatization

Within the social sciences, mediatization is one of the processes discussed in the context of social change as it temporally, spatially, and socially penetrates our lives (Hjarvard, 2008; Krotz, 2014). According to Lundby (2014), mediatization denotes a dynamic process that indicates transformation on technical, institutional, and cultural levels. Through the increasing permeation of society with new forms of media communication, mediatization leads to various processes of social change that can be characterised as “extension, substitution, amalgamation and accommodation” (Schulz, 2004, p. 88).

Consequently, changes in communication, especially through the spread of new types of media (e.g., letterpress printing, steam engine, electrification, internet, social networks), can have significant implications for cultural forms and processes, such as the composition of social fields, cultural symbols, social organisations, value systems, patterns of inter-human relationships, and rules of conduct (Corsi, 2020). As social bodies are essential cultural symbols, changes in communication are interrelated with their medial representation, which in turn also might have consequences for those areas of society in which the body plays a significant role (Lin & Atkin, 2007). In this way, sports and movement culture as well as PE, due to its orientation towards social phenomena within the students’ lifeworld, are directly affected by changes in the media.

Mediatized changes in modern sports and movement culture

Sports and movement culture, is decisively associated with the body and its physical representation since the organised and non-organised communication of the achievements of the human body is its defining characteristic (Stichweh, 2013). With sports and media being intertwined historically (Werron, 2010), mediatization denotes a significant moderator of change in the sports and movement culture (Frandsen, 2020; Whannel, 2013), affecting it on an individual, organisational, and societal level (Ličen et al., 2022). Advances in technology have enabled the widespread use of previously expensive devices for various practices of self-tracking (Rode & Stern, 2019; St. Clair Kreitzberg et al., 2016). The accessibility of high-quality cameras and user-friendly editing software has also impacted the sports and movement culture, particularly with regard to the promotion of specific movement practices within trend sports (Dupont, 2020; Woermann, 2012). Further, athletes are using social media to communicate with fans and engage in public relations (Utz, 2019), while also aligning their behaviour significantly with media expectations (Birkner & Nölleke, 2016). Leagues and clubs have reacted to media demands by converting their stadiums into “giant television studios” (Altheide & Snow, 1991, p. 224) and establishing their own media training departments. Some sports have been adapted to the logic of mass media through the “telegenisation of sporting events” (Schauerte & Schwier, 2004, p. 164), in which competitions are dramatized and dynamized (e.g., shortening of race courses, modified rules and materials, adapted forms of competition) so that the events are more attractive to the media.

One major area in which sports and movement culture has been deeply affected by mediatization in recent years is the self-representation of the body in social networks, which is particularly common among children and adolescents. Motives for this “bodily image practice” (Pürgstaller, 2023, p. 55) on social media differ. Some people may aim to present the (often toned and sculpted) body to others, while others may aim to associate themselves with certain types of sport (Rode & Stern, 2019; e.g., producing videos relating to a specific style or publishing self-tracking data from running apps; St. Clair Kreitzberg et al., 2016) to establish a specific social identity (Schmidt, 2009; Wheaton, 2019). While these identity-forming physical self-representations have so far largely been performed in analogue public spheres, the mass distribution of digital social media has recently provided an additional stage for self-presentation.

Significative physical self-representations in social media

Bodily self-representations in different communicative arenas are of social significance, enabling an analysis of society and social change. As a social symbol, the body fulfils different functions (Gugutzer, 2006). On the one hand, it serves as “a personal front” (Goffman, 1956, p. 15) for the production and communication of social identities in direct interactions. On the other hand, the body and its representation provide indications of shared realities regarding the prevailing social order in society (Stadelbacher, 2016). Social structures impact the design (e.g., tattoos, piercings), the presentation (e.g., permissible permissiveness), the shape (e.g., cosmetic surgery, muscle gain) and the meaning of the body (e.g., object of research, status symbol), and also influence which bodies can be shown publicly (Butler, 1990; Villa, 2008).

Social media offers an unprecedented possibility of depicting the social body and thereby transmitting information. Like bodies in direct analogue interaction, bodies presented in social media inform “about the actor’s social attributes and about his conception of himself, of the others present, and of the setting” (Goffmann, 1963, p. 34). Thereby, bodily self-representations in social media provide a means of identity formation and communication. Oftentimes, displaying the body in social media aims at obtaining social approval and creating a sense of belonging (Nadkarni & Hofmann, 2012), which is why many social actors use impression management strategies to create a desired persona for the audience (Fox & Vendemia, 2016).

However, bodies are not only shaped by society and thus stabilise the existing social order, they can also be designed and positioned to change social order. In this regard, bodies and their re-presentation exert influence particularly on those areas of society in which bodies play a significant role. As more and more athletes, for example, stage physical self-presentations and post bodies on social media, these representations hold potential for changing the sports and movement culture, particularly if the bodily self-representations challenge existing structures (Stanley, 2020), provide platforms for new forms of expression and identities for subsequent generations (Lee & Azzarito, 2021), or trigger changes in routines of action (Stern, 2019).

Building on the steadily expanding mediatization of sports and movement culture and its potential for social change, an increasing number of studies that analyse physical self-representations of athletes in social media has emerged in recent years. However, the existing studies are limited to individual facets, scattered across different scientific disciplines, and have so far been compiled in a cursory manner at best (Grimmer, 2017, 2019; Sanderson, 2011). With our integrative review, we therefore aim to systematically analyse the empirical body of research on physical self-representations of athletes in social media. Specifically, we aim to assess whether and how physical self-representations of athletes in social media signify changes in the sports and movement culture.

Methods

We adopted an integrative review methodology based on the principles described by Dhollande et al. (2021). Integrative reviews allow for the synthesis of diverse research methodologies (e.g., theoretical, experimental and/or non-experimental empirical research, and qualitative, quantitative and/or mixed method studies) and demand applicability of the results to practice, which is why they are particularly relevant in the fields of medicine, politics, or in education (Whittemore & Knafl, 2005). As the research on physical self-representations is a diversely researched field encompassing research from various disciplines and theoretical orientations, we decided to conduct an integrative review (instead of a systematic or scoping review) as we interpret this type of review as being most open to different research methodologies and due to its emphasis on the applicability of results to practice. The practical implications of our integrative review are directed towards the PE context, as our review is framed in terms of education.

Search strategy and eligibility criteria

The search string combined terms related to the sports and movement culture (sport* OR physical activity OR physical culture OR movement culture OR athlete*) and relevant terms in the context of social media (social media OR sns OR instagram OR facebook OR youtube OR tiktok). The search was conducted on 2 February 2023 via six electronic databases: Web of Science and Scopus (general databases), SocIndex (sociology), OLC (media and communication studies), SpoLit and FIS-Bildung (sport science). Additionally, reference lists and citations of the included papers and relevant theoretical papers were screened to identify further studies.

The following eligibility criteria were compulsory for the studies to be included in the review:

  1. primary or secondary empirical research works published in peer-reviewed journals in English or German (the languages each author speaks);

  2. content of the study related to the sports and movement culture and social media;

  3. analysis of types of social media that allow for user generated content and are focused on pictures;

  4. analysis of real pictures with (self-)representation of bodies;

  5. analysis of publicly visible pictures (no private accounts);

  6. studies related to physical activity that exceeds everyday/household activities.

The publication period was set to the period since the founding of Facebook until today (2008-2023). Since we aimed to analyse the empirical body of research on physical self-representations on social media, we only included empirical papers in our review. As most empirical studies nowadays are published in journals, we excluded other types of publications. In line with our research question focusing on physical self-representations of athletes on social media, we excluded papers examining PE. Studies addressing marketing and branding or how social media can be used to increase motivation for physical activity were also excluded from the review.

Study selection, data extraction, and analysis

After a carefully conducted stepwise literature search, the results were exported to Citavi, a reference management software, and duplicates were removed. Two independent reviewers (FM, DJ) screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts for eligibility. To not miss relevant literature, reference lists and citations of the included papers listed in Web of Science and Scopus and relevant theoretical papers were reviewed to identify additional studies. At each step of the process, any discrepancies regarding inclusion or exclusion of studies were consensually resolved by discussion.

The extracted data included:

  1. study characteristics (author, date of publication, journal, objective of the study, discipline of the researchers, and research design);

  2. sample characteristics (type of sports, sample size, geographical location, social media type, and gender);

  3. study design (including data collection methods and data analysis methods);

  4. main outcomes of the studies.

When essential information was missing from the full-texts, the corresponding authors were contacted to obtain the missing details. The search and selection processes were illustrated in a flow chart (see Figure 1). The main descriptive characteristics of the studies were outlined using a detailed table (see Table 1). The relevant results of the included studies were narratively synthesized. To this end, we inductively analysed the findings of included studies and sorted the findings in overarching categories. Therewith, we were able to synthesize the results of individual studies in a systematic and comprehensive fashion.

Quality appraisal

Each article meeting the eligibility criteria was critically appraised to judge the methodological quality. As studies based on different methodologies were included, we used a scoring system for appraising qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies (Pluye et al., 2009). Following the guidelines set by the appraisal tool, a percentage quality score was generated for each study, dividing the sum of positive responses (i.e., specific criterion was fulfilled) by the number of relevant criteria. All articles were independently assessed by two authors (FM, DJ) and were then discussed until consensus was achieved. Cohen’s kappa was calculated as a measure of initial inter-observer agreement.

Results

The initial literature search resulted in 7,947 hits of which 2,278 were duplicates. The remaining 5,669 results were screened based on the title, after which one hundred seventy-one titles remained. After abstract screening, 49 studies were included in the full-text audit. Twenty studies met the eligibility criteria. The reference search and the cited-by-search resulted in the addition of five studies. After methodological quality assessment, all 25 studies were chosen for the integrative review (see Figure 1).

Methodological quality

Initial inter-rater reliability on all assessed studies was almost perfect (ϰ = 0.93; McHugh, 2012). For all deviations, complete agreement was reached by discussion. Most studies implemented a qualitative research design (n = 15; 60%), followed by quantitative designs (n = 9; 36%) and mixed method designs (n = 1; 4%). Overall, the studies had a decent methodological quality, with quality scores ranging from 50 to 80 percent and most studies being located in the upper range. No study was excluded from the review due to methodological reasons. The included qualitative studies show rather low levels of reflexivity, which could be attributed to the disproportionate frequency of qualitative content analyses, which show a stronger proximity to a quantitative paradigm compared to more reconstructive approaches (Holtz & Odağ, 2020). For the quantitative approaches, the appraisal criterion related to the assessment of confounding variables could often not be applied due to the rather observational character of the studies. Again, a dominance of content analytic study designs was evident. In two studies, the basic population remained unclear (Hinz et al., 2021b, 2021a). The results of the methodological quality assessment are presented in the Supplemental material, Tables 1-3.

Descriptive characteristics

Table 1 provides a summary of the descriptive characteristics of the included studies. The dates of publications range between 2012 and 2022, with 14 studies published in the last three years. Most of the studies were conducted in a defined geographic area. Only eight studies analysed posts from all over the world. The most represented country was the United States.

Most studies analysed physical self-representations on Instagram (n = 18). Two papers researched content from YouTube (Kassing, 2018; Woermann, 2012) and one from Facebook (Toffoletti & Thorpe, 2018). Four studies analysed media content across multiple platforms. Most studies (n = 16) searched for content online and used posts from the social network sites (SNS) directly, while others (n = 6) conducted interviews or collected survey data. Three studies combined online and offline content within an ethnographical approach. Eight studies focused on specific physical self-representations of specific athletes, while the other studies (n = 17) assessed physical self-representations of members of online communities that used specific hashtags (such as #yogaforall or #fitspo).

Figure 1. Flow chart of study search and selection process
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics and main results of the included studies

Source

Sport

SNS

Country

Study design

Sample

Methodology

Main results

Bailey et al. (2022)

Yoga

Instagram

worldwide

qualitative

257 posts #YogaForAll and #YogaForEveryone

Collection of posts/reflexive thematic and discourse analysis

Community – creating a global habitus

Bell et al. (2021)

Fitness

SNS

United Kingdom

qualitative

77 adolescents

Group interviews/thematic analysis

Visibility - Deficits in society

Boepple et al. (2016)

Fitness

Instagram

worldwide

quantitative

510 Images from 51 Fitspiration websites

Collection of images/content analysis

Community – creating a global habitus

Chawansky (2016)

Basketball

Instagram

USA

qualitative

Three posts from one black, lesbian celebrity

Collection of posts/analysis via “critical reading of visual body texts”

Visibility - Deficits in society

Dupont (2020)

Skateboarding

Instagram

USA

qualitative

40 male skaters

Ethnography with online and offline content/coding with GTM

Community – creating a global habitus

Ehrlén & Villi (2020)

Climbing/ running

Instagram

Finland

qualitative

10 Finnish climbers and runners

Collection of interviews and posts/content and image type analysis

Community – Elimination of gatekeepers

Hinz et al. (2021a)

Yoga

Instagram

worldwide

quantitative

740 images tagged with #yoga, -women, -practice and -body

Collection of pictures/content analysis

Community – creating a global habitus

Hinz et al. (2021b)

Yoga

Instagram

worldwide

quantitative

380 videos tagged with #yoga, -women, -practice and -body

Collection of videos/content analysis

Community – creating a global habitus

Kassing (2018)

Soccer

YouTube

USA

qualitative

Three videos of three former collegiate female soccer players

Collection of videos/thematic and comparative analysis

Community – creating a global habitus

Visibility - Deficits in society

Liu et al. (2021)

Fitness

Instagram

worldwide

x

Interviews and Instagram data from 76 Participants

Questionnaire and collection of posts/statistical analysis of correlations

Visibility – individual athletes

McCormack (2018)

Mountain bike

SNS

USA

qualitative

60 Interviews, 2,363 surveys and 98 e-mail exchanges

Collection of data/Coding with GTM

Community – Elimination of gatekeepers

McGannon et al. (2022)

Figure skating

Instagram

Canada, Ukraine

qualitative

122 posts of Meagan Duhamel and Aljona Savchenko

Collection of posts/dialogical narrative analysis

Visibility – individual athletes

Mitchell et al. (2019)

Fitness

Instagram

USA, Canada

quantitative

50 Instagram posts tagged with #amputeefitness

Collection of posts via Netlytic/content analysis

Community – Elimination of gatekeepers

Mitchell et al. (2021)

Paralympics

Instagram

USA, Canada

quantitative

Instagram posts from six Paralympians

Collection of posts/content analysis

Visibility - Deficits in society/ niche sports

Mitchell, Van Wyk, et al. (2021)

Paralympics

Instagram

USA, Canada

quantitative

Instagram posts from six Paralympians

Collection of posts/content analysis

Visibility - Deficits in society/ niche sports

Pinkerton et al. (2017)

Fitness

SNS

USA

mixed

244 participants

Collection of survey and SNS data/content and statistical analysis

Community – extending the offline community online

Pocock & Skey (2022)

Various sports

SNS

United Kingdom

qualitative

12 interviews with UK-based elite sportswomen

Collection of interviews/thematic analysis

Visibility – individual athletes

Rahikainen & Toffoletti (2022)

Climbing

Instagram

worldwide

qualitative

32 professional or sponsored female climbers

Ethnography with online and offline content/coding with GTM

Visibility – individual athletes

Santarossa et al. (2019)

Fitness

Instagram

worldwide

quantitative

150 posts tagged with #fitspo

Collection of posts via Netlytic/content analysis

Community – extending the offline community online

Silva et al. (2021)

Soccer

Instagram

Brazil

qualitative

123 posts from the Brazilian women national team of soccer

Collection of posts/content analysis

Visibility - Deficits in society/ niche sports

Stanley (2020)

Hiking

Instagram

USA

qualitative

60 Instagram profiles tagged with #unlikelyhiker

Netnography/critical discourse and visual content analysis

Visibility - Deficits in society

Toffoletti & Thorpe (2018)

Various sports

Facebook

Global North

qualitative

Instagram profiles of five female athletes

Collection of posts/feminist thematic analysis

Visibility – individual athletes

Toffoletti & Thorpe (2021)

Fitness

Instagram

worldwide

qualitative

155 posts of the Bikini Body Guide community

Collection of posts/compositional interpretation

Community – Elimination of gatekeepers

Webb et al. (2019)

Yoga

Instagram

worldwide

quantitative

300 images tagged with #curvyyoga and #curvyfit

Collection of posts/content analysis

Community – creating a global habitus

Woermann (2012)

Freeskiing

YouTube

German speaking countries

qualitative

4 years ethnographic data of the Freeskiing Community

Ethnography with online and offline content/n.a.

Community – creating a global habitus

Notes: Source (Authors and year of published study); Sport (the aspect of the sports and movement culture the study focuses on); SNS (SNS used to derive the data); Country (Country the study was based on/where the researchers live); Study design (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method); Methodology (Methods used for data collection/methods used for data analysis), Main results

Main findings of included studies

In general, the review of the findings reveals notable evidence pointing to mediatized changes in sports and movement culture. In the following, we present a synthesis of the main findings of included studies. Single studies are mentioned in more detail to highlight distinct aspects. When synthesizing the findings of included studies, we noticed that findings can be categorized in two broader categories:

  1. impact of social media on specific sports or movement cultures and

  2. uses and functions of social media within mediatized sports and movement cultures in general.

Some studies presented results hinting to changes that are very specific to one sport and movement culture (e.g., exercise identity in the fitness culture; Liu et al., 2021), while other influences transpired the culture they originated in (e.g., building a community was not limited to the outdoor sports community but could be found in various contexts). This is why we adapted two main categories for the synthesis of the findings of included studies. The subcategories were also derived inductively from the results of the studies.

Impact of social media on specific sports and movement cultures

The influence of social media was mostly studied with regard to specific sports or movement cultures, which is why we summarise the findings for specific sports and movement cultures separately.

One group of studies analyzed physical self-representations in social media tangential to the fitness sector (n = 7), where three main impacts on the specific sports and movement culture can be identified:

Examining its inclusive potential, four studies relate to yoga. Although #yogaforeveryone focuses on the inclusive idea, Bailey et al. (2022) illustrate that the yoga hashtag communities spread a desire for yoga on the one hand, while on the other hand continuing to centre and privilege the young, thin, white, non-disabled, and flexible yoga body. The studies from Hinz et al. (2021b, 2021a) came to the same results, adding objectification and lack of diversity to the list. The image of yoga presented within the content (performative and for advanced people) contradicts the basic idea of yoga and can lead to feelings of exclusion (online and offline). Nevertheless, there are hashtags that embody the basic idea of inclusion. Under #curvyyoga, images can be found that counteract the stereotypical representations and hence transcend obstacles, especially for higher-weight individuals (Webb et al., 2019).

As outdoor activities rely on the exchange of information about routes, spots or equipment, social media aids in finding and connecting to new people or staying in touch with old friends (Ehrlén & Villi, 2020; McCormack, 2018; Stanley, 2020; Woermann, 2012). This connection to people pursuing the same hobby achieved through social media is referenced in five studies. Therefore, social media impacted the outdoor sports community mainly with regard to connection.

Uses and functions of social media within mediatized sports and movement cultures in general

Beside describing the impact of social media on specific sports and movement cultures (such as yoga or fitness), the findings of included studies also highlighted the uses and functions of social media within mediatized sports and movement cultures in general. In this context, two main themes emerge: building community and gaining visibility.

Fourteen studies report on how social media can enhance the building of a community of like-minded individuals, showing three sub-aspects:

Eleven studies report on how social media can be used to gain visibility. Here, we identified three sub-aspects:

Discussion

With our integrative review, we aimed to systematically analyse how physical self-representations posted on social media can be seen as a sign of mediatized change in sports and movement culture(s).

State of research

The included studies show that Instagram is the most researched platform for physical self-representations through pictures. The findings of our review illustrate that the sports and movement culture is influenced by mediatization, however, to various extent and in various ways. Physical self-representations on social media can change specific sports and movement cultures (e.g., fitness, yoga, outdoor activities, skateboarding, freeskiing), particularly in the way in which they are practiced. Informed by a theoretical framework, our findings suggest that people use bodily self-representations on social media as a way to build social identities (Goffman, 1956) and gain visibility but also as a new form of communication (Corsi, 2020) and therefore building community.

Overall, the analysed change(s) in sports and movement cultures indicated in the included studies can be characterised as both direct and indirect (Hjarvard, 2008), affecting different levels of social systems (Ličen et al., 2022). The changes described in the studies appeared to occur independently of the corona pandemic and seemed to persist after Covid-related restrictions. Hence, the corona pandemic might have accelerated but not directly caused the observed changes in the sports and movement culture. However, as the included studies did not explicitly study the impact of the corona pandemic on mediatized physical self-representations on social media, further research is needed in this context. Further, existing studies of physical self-representations in social media were often selective in terms of specific sports cultures and can therefore be characterized as early attempts to understand a specific sports and movement setting. The associated intention to provide initial insights into a particular social field might also explain the frequent use of content analyses. For future research, it seems appropriate to dive deeper into the phenomena at hand, e.g., through more reconstructive qualitative methods or statistical methods that go beyond mere descriptive analyses. Moreover, especially the traditional and institutionalised areas of sports as well as team sports (only represented through soccer) are missing in the current state of research. In addition, research on the influence of mediatization on different groups of people within sports could also be expanded. For example, marginalised groups (in terms of their religion, race, or sexual orientation) or other stakeholders in the sports culture (e.g., coaches, officials) should be considered for a more comprehensive picture. Further, future studies could examine how the effects of physical self-representations on the sports and movement culture of a specific sport differ between countries.

Limitations

Some limitations of our review can be identified. We only included peer-reviewed journal articles published in English or German language listed in the screened databases. Studies in additional languages, grey literature or reports, and articles outside the scope of the selected databases were not included. Since publication cultures might differ between countries, we might have missed some relevant studies. We also acknowledge that further insights could be gained by broadening the search strategy and inclusion criteria. As we aimed to give an overview of empirical studies investigating how the practice of physical self-representations on social media signify changes in the general sports and movement culture, we decided to not include specific sports and movement cultures (such as yoga or outdoor sports) into our search string. Similarly, due to the review’s focus on empirical research, we did not include theoretical papers, even though integrative reviews would offer the possibility to do so. Both aspects offer starting points for future review work on the role of physical self-representation on social media for (specific) sports and movement cultures.

Implications for PE

A key characteristic of PE research is addressing acute societal and political challenges (Oesterhelt et al., 2020). Relatedly, the content of PE is often informed by social phenomena within the students’ lifeworld (Amade-Escot & O’Sullivan, 2007; Zander, 2017) with the aim to create students who are competent to act within social bodily practices and critically reflect, change or transcend existing realities (Ehni, 1977; Nyberg & Larsson, 2014; Serwe-Pandrick et al., 2023; Siedentop et al., 2019). As mediatization affects almost every facet of life, it is not surprising that sports pedagogy is also concerned with how media can be used within PE. In this regard, sports pedagogy differentiates between learning with media and learning about media (Bastian, 2017). Learning with media incorporates all the ways that (digital) technology aids in the processes of learning and teaching of motor skills, abilities and sport-related knowledge (for an overview of possible use cases see Greve et al., 2020; and Jastrow et al., 2022). Learning about media involves that students learn to critically and reflectively consider the consumed media and related digital spaces, worlds and tools meaning digital tools that provide support (e.g., apps), self-tracking, e-sports, and social media (Poweleit, 2021). With regard to learning about social media, two schools of thought can be identified. From the perspective of the disempowerment approach, students need to learn to critically evaluate the content of social media, as it could be potentially harmful (e.g., resulting in body dysmorphia or eating disorders). Another approach is to view social media from an empowerment point of view, where young adults can experiment with new identities and find alternative ways to stage the body that, for example, do not simply have to follow traditional models of beauty (Pürgstaller, 2023).

The results of this review show that social media influenced the sports and movement culture positively through building community and gaining visibility. Therefore, bodily practices on social media that aid in connecting with people and help to be seen and recognized could become part of learning about media within PE.

To initiate discussions with and among students, support a critical engagement with social media, and teach the bodily practices, teachers need to learn specific skills first. Following the concept of TPACK1 (Van Doodewaard & Knoppers, 2018), firstly, one needs to gain the technological knowledge (e.g., how to search for suitable and relevant content). Even though scrolling through the feed or reels is possible without specific searches, this is not the way to reach the full potential. Filter bubbles and algorithms influence what people see (Friedrichs-Liesenkötter & Gross, 2020, p. 3). To circumvent this, one must actively search for specific terms, people, or hashtags. Equally important is a critical selection of people and hashtags to follow. For this, criteria (such as authenticity, disclosure of sponsorship) should be discussed in school. As the studies within this review on specific hashtags show, specific hashtags are often associated with certain communities that share specific values and goals. Within PE, the underlying values and created habitus of certain communities can be analysed and discussed with students. In PE lessons, sports-related influencers who are worth following could be discussed as well as inclusive communities for the respective interests of the students. The second area is producing content. Various elements come into play here. One is the technical aspect, which will not be discussed here. Another aspect to be considered when posting content on social media, is that users have to decide how much information about themselves they want to reveal and who should have access to it. In PE lessons, the consequences of gaining visibility could be discussed with examples from female athletes and the perceived aggressions against them (Chawansky, 2016; Kassing, 2018; Silva et al., 2021). Another aspect is the selection of hashtags as a means to connect one’s pictures to a wider array of similar pictures and therefore connecting to a community. Together with the practices of choosing the same style and content for pictures this can help in building community with like-minded others.

Conclusion

With our integrative review, we were able to synthesize the highly diverse research field of physical self-representations on social media and examine how such practices have affected the sports and movement culture. Overall, the findings of the review illustrate that mediatization, particularly the common practice of posting pictures of the body on social media, has changed sports and movement culture. While some changes have been identified in relation to specific sport and movement cultures such as the fitness or yoga community, other changes transpired the culture they originated in and affected the broader sport and movement culture. More specifically, the synthesis of the studies suggests that the practice of physical self-representation on social media allows users to build community and gain visibility. As social media and bodily (re-)presentation on these platforms are part of everyday lives of children and adolescents, such practices could also be included into the curriculum of PE. In this regard, PE could teach a reflective and critical use of these practices to mitigate the risks of visibility on social media and facilitate the positive effects of online communities.

References

Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1991). Media Worlds in the Postjournalism Era. Aldine de Gruyter.
Amade-Escot, C. (2006). Student learning within the didactique tradition. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Handbook of Physical Education (pp. 347–365). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608009
Amade-Escot, C., & O’Sullivan, M. (2007). Research on content in physical education: theoretical perspectives and current debates. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 12(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980701610144
Bailey, K. A., Rice, C., Gualtieri, M., & Gillett, J. (2022). Is #YogaForEveryone? The idealised flexible bodymind in Instagram yoga posts. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 14(5), 827–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2021.2002394
Bastian, J. (2017). Lernen mit Medien - Lernen über Medien? Eine Bestandsaufnahme zu aktuellen Schwerpunktsetzungen [Learning with media - Learning about media? An inventory of current emphases]. Die Deutsche Schule, 109(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:25979
Bell, B. T., Deighton-Smith, N., & Hurst, M. (2021). “When you think of exercising, you don’t really want to think of puking, tears, and pain”: Young adolescents’ understanding of fitness and #fitspiration. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(7), 1046–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105319869798
Birkner, T., & Nölleke, D. (2016). Soccer players and their media-related behavior: A contribution on the mediatization of sports. Communication & Sport, 4(4), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479515588719
Boepple, L., Ata, R. N., Rum, R., & Thompson, J. K. (2016). Strong is the new skinny: A content analysis of fitspiration websites. Body Image, 17, 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.03.001
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (1st ed.). Routledge.
Chawansky, M. (2016). Be who you are and be proud: Brittney Griner, intersectional invisibility and digital possibilities for lesbian sporting celebrity. Leisure Studies, 35(6), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2015.1128476
Corsi, V. (2020). Sociological analysis and social change. In J. L. Sarasola Sánchez-Serrano, F. Maturo, & Š. Hošková-Mayerová (Eds.), Qualitative and Quantitative Models in Socio-Economic Systems and Social Work (Vol. 208, pp. 485–492). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18593-0_35
Dhollande, S., Taylor, A., Meyer, S., & Scott, M. (2021). Conducting integrative reviews: A guide for novice nursing researchers. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(5), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987121997907
Dupont, T. (2020). Authentic subcultural identities and social media: American skateboarders and Instagram. Deviant Behavior, 41(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1585413
Ehni, H. W. (1977). Sport und Schulsport: Didaktische Analysen und Beispiele aus der schulischen Praxis [Sports and school sports: Didactic analyses and examples from school practice]. Hofmann.
Ehrlén, V., & Villi, M. (2020). “I shared the joy”: Sport-related social support and communality on Instagram. Visual Studies, 35(2–3), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2020.1790304
Fox, J., & Vendemia, M. A. (2016). Selective self-presentation and social comparison through photographs on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(10), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0248
Frandsen, K. (2020). Sport and Mediatization. Routledge.
Friedrichs-Liesenkötter, H., & Gross, F. von. (2020). Erzieherischer Kinder- und Jugendmedienschutz [Educational child and youth media protection]. In U. Sander, F. von Gross, & K.-U. Hugger (Eds.), Handbuch Medienpädagogik (pp. 1–14). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25090-4_105-1
Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.
Goffmann, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hall.
Greve, S., Thumel, M., Jastrow, F., Schwedler-Diesener, A., Krieger, C., & Süßenbach, J. (2020). Digitale Medien im Sportunterricht der Grundschule: Ein Update für die Sportdidaktik⁈ [Digital media in primary school physical education: An update for sports pedagogy?!]. In M. Thumel, R. Kammerl, & T. Irion (Eds.), Digitale Bildung im Grundschulalter. Grundsatzfragen zum Primat des Pädagogischen (pp. 325–340). kopaed.
Grimmer, C. G. (Ed.). (2017). Der Einsatz sozialer Medien im Sport [The use of social media in sports]. Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13588-1
Grimmer, C. G. (Ed.). (2019). Sportkommunikation in digitalen Medien: Vielfalt, Inszenierung, Professionalisierung [Sport communication in digital media: Diversity, staging, professionalization]. Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22844-6
Gugutzer, R. (2006). Body turn. Perspektiven der Soziologie des Körpers und des Sports [Body turn. Perspectives on the sociology of the body and sports] (1st ed.). transcript.
Hinz, A., Mulgrew, K. E., De Regt, T., & Lovell, G. (2021a). Is this what a female yogi looks like? A content analysis of yoga images on Instagram. Body Image, 36, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.003
Hinz, A., Mulgrew, K. E., De Regt, T., & Lovell, G. (2021b). Practice or performance? A content analysis of yoga-related videos on Instagram. Body Image, 39, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.08.002
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181
Holtz, P., & Odağ, Ö. (2020). Popper was not a positivist: Why critical rationalism could be an epistemology for qualitative as well as quantitative social scientific research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(4), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1447622
Jastrow, F., Greve, S., Thumel, M., Diekhoff, H., & Süßenbach, J. (2022). Digital technology in physical education: A systematic review of research from 2009 to 2020. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 52(4), 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00848-5
Kansanen, P., & Meri, M. (1999). The didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. In B. Hudson, F. Buchgberger, P. Kansanen, & H. Seel (Eds.), Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as the Science(-s) of the Teaching Profession? (pp. 107–116). TNTEE. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2646.4726
Kassing, J. W. (2018). Confronting the female athlete paradox with humor and irony: A thematic analysis of SoccerGrlProbs YouTube video content. Sport in Society, 21(7), 1096–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1310202
Krotz, F. (2014). Mediatization as a mover in modernity: Social and cultural change in the context of media change. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication (pp. 131–162). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.131
Lee, J., & Azzarito, L. (2021). Creating thirdspace physical culture for, with, and about recent immigrant girls: Instagram as a space of marginalization and resistance. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 40(4), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2019-0232
Ličen, S., Frandsen, K., Horky, T., Onwumechili, C., & Wei, W. (2022). Rediscovering mediatization of sport. Communication & Sport, 10(5), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795221123675
Lin, C. A., & Atkin, D. J. (Eds.). (2007). Communication technology and social change: Theory and implications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liu, S., Perdew, M., Lithopoulos, A., & Rhodes, R. E. (2021). The feasibility of using Instagram data to predict exercise identity and physical activity levels: Cross-sectional observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e20954. https://doi.org/10.2196/20954
Lundby, K. (2014). Mediatization of communication. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication (pp. 3–38). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.3
McCormack, K. (2018). Building community online and on the trail: Communication, coordination, and trust among mountain bikers. Information, Communication & Society, 21(4), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1290128
McGannon, K. R., Graper, S., & McMahon, J. (2022). Skating through pregnancy and motherhood: A narrative analysis of digital stories of elite figure skating expectant mothers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 59, 102126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102126
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mitchell, F. R., Santarossa, S., Ramawickrama, I. L., Rankin, E. F., Yaciuk, J. A., McMahon, E. R., & Van Wyk, P. M. (2019). An evaluation of social media images portrayal of disability discourse: #amputeefitness. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 12(2), 10–10. https://doi.org/10.5507/euj.2019.010
Mitchell, F. R., Santarossa, S., & Van Wyk, P. M. (2021). The emergence of a paradox of assimilation: An analysis of Olympic and Paralympic athletes’ Instagram posts. Sport in Society, 26(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2021.1979521
Mitchell, F. R., Van Wyk, P. M., & Santarossa, S. (2021). Curating a culture: The portrayal of disability stereotypes by Paralympians on Instagram. International Journal of Sport Communication, 14(3), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2021-0030
Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
Nyberg, G., & Larsson, H. (2014). Exploring “what” to learn in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.726982
Oesterhelt, V., Gerlach, E., Grimminger-Seidensticker, E., & Friedrich, G. (2020). Sportdidaktik - Bestandesaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven [Sport didactics - State of the art and research perspectives]. In M. Rothgangel, U. Abraham, H. Bayrhuber, V. Frederking, W. Jank, & H. J. Vollmer (Eds.), Lernen im Fach und über das Fach hinaus: Bestandsaufnahmen und Forschungsperspektiven aus 17 Fachdidaktiken im Vergleich. Waxmann.
Pinkerton, S., Tobin, J. L., Querfurth, S. C., Pena, I. M., & Wilson, K. S. (2017). “Those sweet, sweet likes”: Sharing physical activity over social network sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.028
Pluye, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009
Pocock, M., & Skey, M. (2022). “You feel a need to inspire and be active on these sites otherwise . . . people won’t remember your name”: Elite female athletes and the need to maintain “appropriate distance” in navigating online gendered space. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211069343
Poweleit, A. (2021). Medienpädagogische Aspekte für den Schulsport - Lernen über Medien [Media pedagogical aspects for school sports - Learning about media]. Sportunterricht, 70(10), 451–456.
Pürgstaller, E. (2023). (Im)perfect bodies 2.0 – Body concepts in current bodily practices. Vierteljahrsschrift Für Wissenschaftliche Pädagogik, 99(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.30965/25890581-09703078
Rahikainen, K., & Toffoletti, K. (2022). “I just don’t wanna deal with the headache of people fighting over the internet”: A study of sponsored female climbers’ digital labor. Sociology of Sport Journal, 39(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2020-0177
Rode, D., & Stern, M. (2019). Konstellationen von Körper, Medien und Selbst: Zeitgenössische körperbezogen-mediale Praktiken als Orte von Gesellschafts- und Selbst-Bildungsdynamiken: Eine programmatische Einführung [Constellations of body, media, and self: Contemporary body-media practices as sites of social and self-education dynamics: A programmatic introduction]. In D. Rode & M. Stern (Eds.), Self-Tracking, Selfies, Tinder und Co. - Konstellationen von Körper, Medien und Selbst in der Gegenwart (pp. 7–34). transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839439081-001
Sanderson, J. (2011). It’s a whole new ballgame: How social media is changing sports. Hampton Press.
Santarossa, S., Coyne, P., Lisinski, C., & Woodruff, S. J. (2019). #fitspo on Instagram: A mixed-methods approach using Netlytic and photo analysis, uncovering the online discussion and author/image characteristics. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(3), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316676334
Schauerte, T., & Schwier, J. (2004). Die Telegenisierung von Sporterignissen - Anpassung von Sportarten und ihrem Regelwerk an mediale Bedingungen [The telegenization of sporting events - Adapting sports and their rules and regulations to media conditions]. In T. Schierl (Ed.), Die Visualisierung des Sports in den Medien (1. Aufl). von Halem.
Schmidt, R. (2009). Soziale Ungleichheit und Sport: Körperliche Repräsentationsarbeit und Unterscheidungskämpfe [Social inequality and sport: Physical representation work and struggles of distinction]. In M. Marschik, R. Müllner, O. Penz, & G. Spitaler (Eds.), Sport studies (pp. 162–172). facultas.wuv.
Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323104040696
Serwe-Pandrick, E., Jaitner, D., & Engelhardt, S. (2023). “Reflective practice” in physical education: Didactic interferences between movement practices and intellectual practices from the perspective of physical education teachers in Germany. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-023-00897-4
Siedentop, D., Hastie, P., & Mars, H. V. D. (2019). Complete Guide to Sport Education (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics.
Silva, A. L. dos S., Da Silveira, R., Klanovicz, J. M., & Jaeger, A. A. (2021). Training of women athletes: An Instagram analysis of players from the Brazilian women’s national football team in times of pandemic. Movimento (Porto Alegre), 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.110137
St. Clair Kreitzberg, D., Dailey, S. L., Vogt, T. M., Robinson, D., & Zhu, Y. (2016). What is your fitness tracker communicating?: Exploring messages and effects of wearable fitness devices. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 17(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2016.1220418
Stadelbacher, S. (2016). Die körperliche Konstruktion des Sozialen: Zum Verhältnis von Körper, Wissen und Interaktion [The physical construction of the social: On the relationship between body, knowledge, and interaction]. transcript.
Stanley, P. (2020). Unlikely hikers? Activism, Instagram, and the queer mobilities of fat hikers, women hiking alone, and hikers of colour. Mobilities, 15(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1696038
Stern, M. (2019). Körper - Medien - Selbst in neuen Sportpraktiken [Body - Media- Self in new sport practices]. In D. Rode & M. Stern (Eds.), Self-Tracking, Selfies, Tinder und Co. - Konstellationen von Körper, Medien und Selbst in der Gegenwart (1st ed., pp. 37–54). transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839439081-002
Stichweh, R. (2013). Sport as a function system in world society. European Journal for Sport and Society, 10(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2013.11687913
Toffoletti, K., & Thorpe, H. (2018). Female athletes’ self-representation on social media: A feminist analysis of neoliberal marketing strategies in “economies of visibility”. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517726705
Toffoletti, K., & Thorpe, H. (2021). Bodies, gender, and digital affect in fitspiration media. Feminist Media Studies, 21(5), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1713841
Utz, S. (2019). Die Rolle sozialer Medien im Sport – Eine Einführung [The role of social media in sports - An introduction]. In C. G. Grimmer (Ed.), Sportkommunikation in digitalen Medien. Vielfalt, Inszenierung, Professionalisierung (pp. 3–17). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22844-6_1
Van Doodewaard, C., & Knoppers, A. (2018). Digital technologies and the hidden curriculum in the educational praxis of physical education. In J. Koekoek & I. van Hilvoorde (Eds.), Digital Technology in Physical Education. Global Perspectives (pp. 164–180). Routledge.
Villa, P.-I. (2008). Körper [Body]. In N. Baur, H. Korte, M. Löw, & M. Schroer (Eds.), Handbuch Soziologie (pp. 201–217). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91974-4_10
Webb, J. B., Thomas, E. V., Rogers, C. B., Clark, V. N., Hartsell, E. N., & Putz, D. Y. (2019). Fitspo at every size? A comparative content analysis of #curvyfit versus #curvyyoga Instagram images. Fat Studies, 8(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2019.1548860
Werron, T. (2010). World sport and its public. On historical relations of modern sport and the media. In U. Wagner, R. K. Storm, & J. M. Hoberman (Eds.), Observing sport: Modern system theoretical approaches (pp. 33–60). Hofmann.
Whannel, G. (2013). Reflections on communication and sport: On mediatization and cultural analysis. Communication & Sport, 1(1–2), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479512471335
Wheaton, B. (2019). Staying “stoked”: Surfing, ageing and post-youth identities. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 54(4), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690217722522
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Woermann, N. (2012). On the slope is on the screen: Prosumption, social media practices, and scopic systems in the freeskiing subculture. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(4), 618–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211429363
Zander, B. (2017). Lebensweltorientierter Schulsport: Sozialisationstheoretische Grundlagen und didaktische Perspektiven [Lifeworld-oriented school sports: Sociological foundations and didactic perspectives]. Meyer & Meyer.

Notes

1TPACK is a framework, that illustrates the main challenges that are characteristic for digital innovation in PE by combining technological knowledge, content knowledge, and pedagogical knowledge into technological pedagogical content knowledge (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).

Editorial team

Editor-in-Chief:

Claudio R. Nigg, University of Bern, Switzerland

Guest Editor:

Sebastian Ruin, University of Graz, Austria

Acknowledgements

Funding

The authors have no funding or support to report.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Data availability statement

All relevant data are within the paper.